Evaluate .
Show the worked solution
Answer: 6
Substituting gives , so I factor: for . The limit only cares about values near 3, so the answer is .
OMPT drill — Calculus
Limits at infinity and around excluded points, mostly via algebraic simplification. On the OMPT this stays computational — no epsilon-delta in sight. Say the rule you are using out loud before you differentiate or integrate — it sounds silly and it works.
Tested inOMPT-D
A limit asks what value a function is heading toward, which is a different question from what value it takes. is undefined at , plugging in gives , yet as creeps toward 3 from either side, the outputs creep toward 6. We write : the destination exists even though the function never stands on it.
On the OMPT this topic stays computational, and that is good news. No epsilon-delta arguments, no pathological cases: just two situations, each with a standard fix. Situation one: substituting gives , which means a common factor is hiding in top and bottom; factor, cancel, substitute again. Situation two: runs off to infinity, and the question becomes a contest between growth rates that the highest powers always win. Learn the two fixes and every limit on the test yields to one of them.
Evaluate .
Answer: 6
Substituting gives , so I factor: for . The limit only cares about values near 3, so the answer is .
Evaluate .
Answer: B —
Dividing top and bottom by gives . As the small terms vanish, leaving . With equal degrees, the limit is always the ratio of leading coefficients.
Evaluate .
Answer: 4
I match the argument of the sine with the denominator: . Since as , the limit is .
Which of the following limits does NOT exist?
Answer: A —
For , the value is from the right and from the left; the one-sided limits disagree, so the limit fails to exist. The others all converge: the squeeze theorem gives 0 for the second, factoring gives 4 for the third, and the standard limit gives 1 for the fourth.
A student evaluates . Step 1: this looks like a limit of a quotient, so apply l'Hôpital's rule. Step 2: differentiate top and bottom to get . Step 3: substitute to get 2. Which step contains the error?
Answer: Step 1
The error is the very first move. L'H\^opital's rule only applies to the indeterminate forms or , but here direct substitution works fine: . Steps 2 and 3 execute the (inapplicable) rule correctly, which is why the wrong answer 2 looks so convincing.
The function for , with , is continuous at . Find .
Answer: 4
Continuity at demands . Factoring, near 2, so the limit is 4 and therefore .